Morrissette v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Kimberly-Clark Corporation appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Elwin HO) granting the petition of its employee, Anita Morrissette, for restoration of benefits. Kimberly-Clark contends that the retroactive application of 39-A M.R.S.A. § 224 (Supp.2002) to determine Morris-sette’s level of benefits was a violation of the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers because it altered a previous calculation of benefits made consistent with our decision in Bernard v. Mead Publ’g Paper Din, 2001 ME 15, 765 A.2d 576. We disagree with…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Gauthier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Dobson v. Quinn Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Christine S. Angell v. Renald C. HalleeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Grubb v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Robert E. Dupuis v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
- Wellman v. SCHAD EXCAVATION, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Grubb v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.