Legal Opinion

Hall v. Lunsford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 6, 1987No. 87-52PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This case involves landlord/tenant issues and was initiated by the appellee filing an action for unpaid rent, damages to the rental house and monies owed on a propane bill. Appellants answered, denying the appellee’s allegations and counterclaimed for damages, alleging appellee had breached an implied warranty of habitability. The trial judge granted the appellee’s motion to dismiss appellants’ cause of action based upon an implied warranty theory, holding no such action exists in Arkansas. The judge’s order left intact appellants’ wrongful eviction action as well as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. City of BentonvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Sherman v. G & H TRANSPORTATION, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Budd v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Mueller v. KillamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. State v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Community Dialysis Centers, Inc. v. MehtaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Dooley v. GramlingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API