Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. City of Bentonville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 1, 1982No. 81-208PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The appellee city initiated this suit in circuit court seeking to exercise its power of eminent domain to procure an easement across appellants’ property. Appellee alleged the easement was necessary to complete the construction of a public improvement, i.e. an underground primary electrical service line and placing a pad mount thereon. Appellants answered and denied that the appellee had any statutory authority to exercise the power of eminent domain for the purpose stated. Appellant landowners then filed a motion requesting that the circuit court transfer the case to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass'n Board v. Corning Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. H. E. McConnell & Son v. SadleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. KesnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Piercy v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Roy v. International Multifoods Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mueller v. KillamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Kilgore v. VinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Israel v. OskeyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Sevenprop Associates v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Associates Financial Services Co. of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Crawford County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API