Legal Opinion

Dooley v. Gramling

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 7, 1988No. 88-171Published

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

This is another Rule 54(b) case. Michael Dooley filed suit against Eddie Gramling, Charles Gramling and American Deposit Insurance Company (later amended to substitute Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Company). The trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of Charles Gramling. Notice of appeal from that order was given, and the case was filed and fully briefed in this court.

ARCP Rule 54(b) has caused the dismissal of many cases. See Bryan Farms, Inc. v. State, 295 Ark. 180, 747 S.W.2d 115 (1988); Pitts v. Sipes, 293 Ark. 340, 737 S.W.2d 647 (1987); Rone v. Little,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Kilcrease v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Murry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Tackett v. RobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Hall v. LunsfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API