Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Killam

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 25, 1988No. 87-296PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

The appellees, Radcliffe Killam, et al., filed a complaint against the appellants, Thomas Mueller, et al., praying that title to certain mineral interests be confirmed in the appellees, that certain oil and gas leases, along with any assignments or other conveyances of the appellants be set aside, for an accounting for all oil, gas, or other minerals produced by the appellants on the mineral acres, and for damages for trespass. The trial court found that the appellees were owners of the mineral acres and that appellants Mueller and Texas Oil and Gas Corporation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. Fratesi v. BondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Hyatt v. City of BentonvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Kilgore v. VinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Sevenprop Associates v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pledger v. BosnickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Villines v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. MilburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. McCrory v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Wilburn v. Keenan Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API