Legal Opinion

Chedwick v. UPMC

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 2007No. 2:07-cv-00806PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT

TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge.

Before the Court for disposition is DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT CDocument No. 3), Defendant’s Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss (Document No. k), and Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 6). For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part.

Procedural History and Background

The context of the present motion can best be understood by reference to two similar cases. Bolden v. Magee-Women’s Hospital of the University…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. McKIVITZ v. Township of StoweDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Venter v. PotterDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Chedwick v. UPMCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API