Legal Opinion
Rowen & Blair Electric Co v. Flushing Operating Corp
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 29, 1973No. Docket 14751PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the entry of a summary judgment dismissing its suit against the defendants on the grounds that there were "no facts stated in any of the sworn complaints, affidavits, or admissions of the plaintiff” to support its claim. GCR 1963, 117.2(3).
On or about July 1, 1969, and pursuant to an oral contract between the plaintiff and Dutch Treat Bakers, Inc., (hereinafter known as Dutch Treat), plaintiff began to furnish labor and materials in connection with the installation of electrical work for the improvement of the building occupied by Dutch Treat. The building was formally…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Beck v. Delta Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Rogowski v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Reinhardt v. BennettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Merithew v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilhelm v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- McLaughlin v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Madison National Bank v. LipinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- MERIT ELECTRIC CO. v. J. Boyle, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Rowen & Blair Electric Co. v. Flushing Operating Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.