Legal Opinion

Schnibbe v. Glenz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

This is an action to enforce a restrictive covenant affecting premises known as No. 220 Rutland road, at the comer of Rutland road and Rogers avenue in the city of Brooklyn. The restrictive covenant provides that the owner of these premises will not “ erect or cause or suffer or permit to be erected ” thereon “ any building or erection other than a private dwelling house for one family only.” The complaint alleges on information and belief that the defendant Fred Glenz has erected or caused to be erected over a door on the Rogers avenue side of said house owned by the defendants a sign…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kirschbaum v. . EschmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Harley v. . PlantNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Baumert v. . MalkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Smith v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Powers v. PaddingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Gracie Square Realty Corp. v. Choice Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Osborne v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Rautenstrauch v. BakhruAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Schnibbe v. GlenzNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API