Legal Opinion

Barth v. Board of Pension Commissioners

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1983No. Civ. 68059PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

Appellant Sidney Barth appeals from a judgment denying a writ of administrative mandamus. Appellant sought the writ to compel the Board of Pension Commissioners (the Board) of the City of Los Angeles (the City) to accept his application for a service-connected disability pension. At issue is (1) whether the provisions of the Charter of the City of Los Angeles (the Charter) permit appellant to apply for a disability pension although he has already requested and received a service pension; and (2) whether charter sections 376 and 376.1, barring claims not presented to the City…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Appalachian Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Bjorndal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. McDonald v. ANTELOPE VALLEY COLLEGE DIST.California Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API