United Tungsten Corp. v. Corporation Service, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, J.:
We have before us for determination the validity of appellants’ contention that the judgment must be reversed because it is based upon an express contract between the parties, whereas respondent sought judgment upon a quantum meruit. We have decided that the contention is without merit and that the judgment must be affirmed.
The action is concerned with the employment of Corporation Service, Inc., by United Tungsten Corporation and George G. Moore for the purpose of sending out certain literature to the stockholders of Atlas Consolidated Tungsten Mines, Inc., and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maitia v. Allied L. & L. S. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
- Johnson v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1960
- Warren v. Glasgow Exploration Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schwartz v. SchwartzNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Lagrange Construction, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Close v. Isbell Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Sack v. TomlinNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Prestie v. PrestieNevada Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.