Legal Opinion
Sack v. Tomlin
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1994No. 23856PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Catherine P. Sack (Cathy) and respondent Rickey Randell Tomlin (Rickey) commenced living together in March of 1984. Six months later Cathy obtained a divorce from her husband, William Sack (William). Pursuant to the divorce decree, Cathy received fee simple ownership to a house in Carson City, Nevada. In exchange, Cathy gave William a lump sum promissory note, in the amount of $43,082.00, due and payable on September 30, 1990. As the due date on the promissory note drew closer, Cathy contemplated her two viable alternatives: refinance or sell the house. After discussing the…
3Cases cited30 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Hay v. HayNevada Supreme Court · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Certified Fire Protection, Inc. v. Precision Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
- D.M. v. D.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Williams v. WilliamsNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Estate of GarlandMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. Real Property Located at Incline VillageDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.