Cinnamon Square Shopping Center v. Meadowlark Enterprises
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, J. *
Appellant, landlord, appeals from a judgment in favor of tenant in an unlawfiil detainer action. The trial court found that the amount demanded in the notice to pay rent exceeded the amount owed and hence was deficient. On that basis, the court held for tenant. Landlord contends (1) the court erred in awarding judgment to tenant since the latter failed to tender the amount of rent acknowledged to be due as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 1161.1; (2) the trial court improperly reformed the lease; and (3) there was insufficient evidence to support the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Paul v. Milk Depots, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Union Oil Co. v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- County of Fresno v. SheltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Shapiro v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CCDCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Farahani v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Bakkers v. Bakkers CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.