Legal Opinion
Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 2, 2006No. B178676PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOLAND, J.
SUMMARY
Appellant Charles Gelfo sued his former employer, respondent Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, a division of Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed), alleging disability discrimination in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12940, subds. (a), (m), (n)), 1 and wrongful termination in violation of public policy. Gelfo was laid off as part of a reduction in force while suffering from a workplace injury. Lockheed later offered Gelfo a different position, but rescinded its offer after determining medical restrictions imposed as a result…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Edward R. Williams Angelynne Williams, H/w v. Philadelphia Housing Authority Police Department, Edward R. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Katz v. City Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Gillen v. Fallon Ambulance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Scotch v. Art Institute of California-Orange County, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Nealy v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Wysinger v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SO. CALIF.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Kelley v. Corrections Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.