Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CCDC
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 2005No. D045506PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IRION, J.
In this appeal, we examine whether Centre City Development Corporation (CCDC)—a nonprofit corporation created by the City of San Diego—may hold closed-session meetings with legal counsel for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Diego (the Agency) to assist the Agency with its eminent domain litigation. Seeking declaratory, injunctive and mandamus relief, plaintiff Melvin Shapiro alleges that defendant CCDC’s Board of Directors (CCDC Board) must meet in open session with the Agency’s legal counsel pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act) (Gov. Code, § 54950 et…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stonehouse Homes LLC v. City of Sierra MadreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Trancas Property Owners Ass'n v. City of MalibuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Page v. Miracosta Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Fredericks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Crawley v. Alameda County Waste Management AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.