Legal Opinion

Allen Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1951No. Appeal, No. 125PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellant’s claim for unemployment compensation was denied, the board finding that his discharge was due to “willful misconduct connected with his work”, within the meaning of §402(e), 43 P.S. §802, of the Unemployment Compensation Law.

Appellant was a taxi driver for the Yellow Cab Company for 21 months, during which he was involved in 8 traffic accidents,1 5 of which occurred in the last 6 months of his employment. Most were minor in degree, yet the employer incurred $555 in expenses on their account. The last was the most serious and involved further expense; a collision…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Bernstein v. Lipper Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Coulter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Schappe v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Sopko Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API