Legal Opinion

Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeal, 76PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

Frances P. Ristis, the claimant herein, was declared eligible for unemployment compensation benefits by the bureau, the referee and the board.

The appellant, who was claimant’s last employer, contends she should be disqualified under the provisions of Section 402(e), 43 PS §802, of the Unemployment Compensation Law, of December 5, 1936, P. L. 2897 (1937) as amended, which provides:

“A claimant shall be ineligible for compensation for any week . . .
“(e) In which his unemployment is due to his discharge or temporary suspension from work for willful misconduct connected with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Allen Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. James v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Kanouse v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Philadelphia Coke Division, Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API