Legal Opinion

Sopko Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1951No. Appeal, 42PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by claimant from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. Claimant had been employed for approximately forty years by J. G. Curtis Leather Company, Ludlow, Pennsylvania. During most of that period he worked as a machine operator. In May, 1950, however, the department in which he worked was temporarily closed. In order to make work available for claimant, as well as for several other employes, the company, during such period, assigned them to temporary work around the plant such as cutting grass and weeds and cleaning up. For this work…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Fazio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Allen Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Laney Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Moyer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Weimer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API