Cabiale v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California; Maurice T. Dooling, Judge. _ . - _ . Louis Cabíale and Andrew Donizello were convicted of violation of the National Prohibition Act, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
In nine counts the plaintiffs in error and seven other persons, their employees, were charged hy information with certain violations of the National Prohibition Act (Act Oct. 28, 1919, c. 85, 41 Stat. 305). The ninth count was subsequently withdrawn.
Upon the trial there was a verdict of not guilty as to all of the defendants, except the two plaintiffs in error. Each of them was found guilty by the jury under count 3 of the information, and each of them was found guilty under certain other of the counts, and not guilty as *770to certain of them. Count 3 was the only count that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
- Rothman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Melanson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- MacDaniel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- People v. NorcrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Carnahan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Tudor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.