Legal Opinion

Melanson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1919No. Nos. 3195, 3200PublishedCited by 17 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District óf Texas; William R. Smith, Judge. M. C. Melanson and Guillermo Q. Ellsworth were convicted of violations of and conspiracy.to violate the Harrison Narcotic Act, and they bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted under two separate, but similar, indictments; each charging violations of section 2 of the Harrison Narcotic Act (Act Dec. 17, 1914, c. 1, 38 Stat. 786 [Comp. St. § 6287h]), and of a conspiracy to violate that section of the act, under section 37 of the Penal Code of the United States (Act March 4, 1909, c. 321, 35 Stat. 1096 [Comp. St. § 10201]), in separate counts. The trials were separate, but the questions presented by the appeals, with one exception, are the same.

Each defendant was charged with having conspired with one M. A.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fyke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
  2. Thurston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Newman v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  2. Rothman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. Daugherty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Sears v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920
  5. Robertson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API