Legal Opinion

Tudor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1944No. 10413PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was indicted for violating § 11 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 311,1 and moved to quash the indictment. The motion was denied. Appellant pleaded not guilty, was tried, was convicted, was sentenced and has appealed.

Four alleged errors are assigned. Assignment 1 is that the court erred in denying the motion to quash the indictment. The denial of a motion to quash an indictment is not reviewable.2 Hence this assignment cannot be considered.

Assignments 2 and 3 are that the court erred in admitting evidence.3 These…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Kay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Ray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Yenkichi Ito v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  5. Forte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. Kempe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  3. Ziegler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. United States v. EramdjianDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1957
  5. Chevillard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API