Legal Opinion

MacK v. Strauss

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 5, 2001No. Civ.A. 00-1713(ESH)PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUVELLE, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, plaintiffs Opposition, and defendant’s Reply. Having considered the pleadings and the entire record herein, the Court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff John Mack is employed by Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) as a GS-15 Supervisory Financial Analyst in the Corporate Finance and Negotiations Department (“CFND”). Plaintiff is an insulin dependant diabetic and suffers from end stage renal failure.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Lester v. NatsiosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. Rattigan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Dorns v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API