Legal Opinion
Ritter v. Shotwell
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1964No. 36838PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dawson, J. †
C. H. Ritter, an agent of the United Pacific Insurance Company, brought this action to recover the unpaid balance of a premium, the consideration for a performance bond issued by his principal. The bond was written to insure performance of a contract awarded to J. G. Shotwell, a defendant, by the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the Interior of the United States, for supplying pozzolan at the site of the Glen Canyon Dam and Power Plant, Glen Canyon Unit, Arizona-Utah Middle River Division, Colorado River Storage Project, at an agreed price. The performance bond was in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Isaacson Iron Works v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
- Way v. Pacific Lumber & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Yakima Lodge No. 53, K. of P. v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Lane v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by8 opinions
- S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines), Plaintiff v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Nielsen Contracting, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hennessy v. VanderhoefCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Haberman v. ElledgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Smith v. Skone & Connors Produce, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.