Lane v. Henry
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered March 22, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action of replevin.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The purpose of this action, as stated in the complaint, was to recover specific personal property, and in the alternative damages.
The facts, so far as necessary to here set them forth, are in substance as follows: On or about the 6th day of September, 1911, the respondent, being then the owner of a diamond ring, sought to pledge the same to one Oscar E. Jensen for a loan. Jensen not being able to make the loan himself, stated to the respondent that he would secure the money for him. Thereupon the ring was taken by Jensen and application made to one Travis, manager of the Provident Pledge *173Socie…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Way v. Pacific Lumber & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Ferguson-Hendrix Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Hughes v. SnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Howell v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
- Yakima Lodge No. 53, K. of P. v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Ritter v. ShotwellWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Breslin v. ToddWashington Supreme Court · 1941