Legal Opinion

Connelly v. Cosgrove, No. Cv 98-057 80 00 (Apr. 27, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 27, 1999No. CV 98-057 80 00Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

RULING RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (#103)

The defendant, pursuant to Prac. Bk. Section 10-31 (a),1 has moved to dismiss this action on the following grounds: (1) the complaint was not returned to court in accordance with General Statutes Section 52-46a,2 and (2) the complaint was not served in compliance with the requirements of General Statutes Section 52-57 (a) and 52-54.3 The defendant filed memoranda of law and an affidavit supporting the motion; the pro se plaintiff has filed an objection to the motion (#107), together…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bergin v. BerginConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  2. Arpaia v. CorroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. White-Bowman Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. BiaforeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Lemoine v. McCannConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Ertel v. CarothersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API