Legal Opinion
White-Bowman Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Biafore
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 5, 1980PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid M. Shea, J.
In this suit on a debt the plaintiff obtained judgment against the defendant after a default 1 had been entered following the denial of the defendant’s motion to erase for lack of service upon him. The defendant has appealed and has assigned as the only error claimed the denial of his motion to erase.
The plaintiff initiated this proceeding by obtaining an ex parte order for a prejudgment remedy of garnishment of any assets of the defendant held by two of his debtors. It appears from the return that after serving the two debtors the sheriff searched for the defendant in several towns,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Felletter v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Hodge v. HodgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Upson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Tarnopol v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Cortes v. CottonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. PumphreyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Bicio v. BrewerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.