Ertel v. Carothers
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs administrative appeal from the decision of the department of environmental protection. On appeal to the trial court, the plaintiff was obligated, by the provisions of General Statutes (Rev. to 1989 as in effect until July 1, 1989) § 4-183 (b),1 to serve the appeal petition on the agency and all parties of record. The record discloses that the agency permitted Oak Leaf Marina, Inc., Scott Masse and Sherry Masse to become parties to these proceedings as intervenors, and, as parties, were entities that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Glastonbury Volunteer Ambulance Ass'n v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Polymer Resources, Ltd. v. KeeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Tarnopol v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Felletter v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. State Employees' Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Tax Collector v. MileyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Kindl v. Department of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Greco v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Ertel v. RocqueConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.