Legal Opinion
Arpaia v. Corrone
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 6, 1989No. 6273PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacobson, J.
This is a summary process action in which the defendants appeal from the judgment, rendered after a trial to the court, awarding possession to the plaintiff landlords. They claim that the trial court erred (1) in denying their motion to dismiss and (2) in concluding that the parties had orally agreed to a month-to-month lease and that the lease had terminated by lapse of time. We find error.
The plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that the parties had orally agreed to a month-to-month lease and that the lease term had expired. The summons and complaint set the return date as January 29, 1987, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Klosenski v. FlahertySupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Bergin v. BerginConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Denison v. CraftsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Safford v. Morris Metal Products Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Danziger v. ShaknaitisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Reynolds v. Allicock, No. Fa99-0721565 (Feb. 9, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Arre v. May, No. Cv96-0564481 S (Mar. 27, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Barnett v. Zoning Board of Appeals, No. Cv94 0138049 (Nov. 15, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.