Legal Opinion
Lemoine v. McCann
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 5, 1996No. 14741PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered after the trial court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the basis of sovereign immunity. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court appointed the defendant attorney as a special assistant public defender to represent the plaintiff in a criminal matter. After a jury trial, the plaintiff was convicted of several counts of the crimes with which he was charged. The plaintiff appealed.
The Appellate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Doe v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Long v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997
- Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Worthen v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2000
- Carrubba v. MoskowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Cox v. AikenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.