Legal Opinion

Best v. Burch

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1955No. Civ. 16301PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs and respondents on March 5, 1951, decreeing that plaintiffs recover from defendant the sum of $985.05 and costs.

Plaintiffs and respondents Ervin S. Best and Charles Baer, attorneys, instituted suit in the municipal court against Marble E. Burch for recovery of the balance due on a promissory note which had been executed in payment for legal services rendered to appellant by respondents. Defendant by his verified answer admitted execution and delivery of the note.

Appellant filed an answer, counterclaims and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Kelly v. LiddicoatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Donze v. DonzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Neighbours v. RittenhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Chard v. O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. De Echeguren v. De EchegurenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Murphy v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. House v. LalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Clayton v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Barisich v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API