Legal Opinion
Chard v. O'Connell
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 1941No. Civ. 11446PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. A previous judgment for plaintiff was reversed for lack of evidence to support it in Chard v. O’Connell, 7 Cal. (2d) 663 [62 Pac. (2d) 369], The basic facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court on the former appeal and we deem it unnecessary to extend this opinion by again reciting them.
Two matters presented on this appeal may be somewhat summarily disposed of. After an amended complaint had been filed defendant and appellant O’Connell made a motion for change of place of trial which was ordered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- England v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Chard v. O'CONNELLCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Holland v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Menghetti v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Simmons v. FridaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Airola v. GorhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Wilson v. MartinezWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
- Rogers v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.