Legal Opinion

Critchfield v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 2, 1932No. 12,399PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

Fred Critchfield was convicted of a felony and sen tenced to the penitentiary. He prosecutes this writ, assigning as error: (1) The insufficiency of the the information; (2) the insufficiency of the verdict; (3) the appearance of special counsel; (4) erroneous rulings on evidence.

The information herein, evidently drawn under the provisions of section 6728, C. L. 1921, charged that defendant “* * * on or about the 9th day of October * * * at and within the * * * did then and there unlawfully and feloniously steal, embezzle, sell, drive, lead and carry away one red yearling heifer * * * of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Koontz v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Sweek v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. State v. HennSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. State v. OwenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Arnett v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. Gill v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. People v. RapiniSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  4. People v. CouchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  5. Warren v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API