Legal Opinion

People v. . Dimick

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1887PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Daniel Driscoll, from a judgment of the general term of the supreme court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order, affirming a judgment of the court of general sessions for the city and county of New York, after a trial resulting in a verdict of the jury convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Ruger, Ch.J.

The questions involved in this appeal are so fully and satisfactorily discussed in the opinion of Babteett, J., at general term (5 N. Y. Crim. Rep. 551), that it is unnecessary to go much into detail, in giving our reasons for affirming the judgment of the court below. In capital cases, however, it has been the custom of this court to state with some particularity the grounds upon which its decision is based, although it may involve, to some extent, a repetition of the views expressed by other courts.

The record in this case shows that the defendant was tried September 27, 1886, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waldele v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. O'Brien v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Wilke v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. People v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. . McQuadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. People v. . PeckensNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. People v. FeerickNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. MulreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Bullock v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API