Legal Opinion

State v. Owens

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1964No. 39,207PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered on a plea of guilty to an information charging forgery in the second degree. The defendant contends that under authority of State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326, 121 N. W. (2d) 577, the information upon which he was arraigned is fatally defective and that he is accordingly entitled to a reversal.

The prosecution resulted from a complaint by one August Lederman who cashed a forged check for the defendant which was endorsed by him. The check was payable to defendant in the sum of $300. It purported to bear the signature of one…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. People v. AresenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. State v. OmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. State v. BritonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. BrittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. State v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Wagner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. DinneenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API