James v. Falk
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
The jury sustained plaintiff’s contention that defendant had committed malpractice in attempting to treat her for a fracture of the femur in her right leg. Defendant appeals from the judgment entered. He submits fifty-one assignments of error. Most of the assignments challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain certain allegations of the complaint. There are also assignments directed at the failure of the trial court to take the case from the jury.
The trial was long; the facts complicated. The record contains hundreds of pages of detailed, technical medical testimony. For us to answer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldfoot v. LofgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Hamilton v. KelseyOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Carruthers v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Sheppard v. FirthOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Cobb v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Lewis v. Baker, Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Ferguson v. GonyawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Creasey v. HoganOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Sandford v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.