Carruthers v. Phillips
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
In its discussion of the rulings upon the motion for nonsuit and directed verdict, the brief of the learned counsel for the defendant is of less than usual value because it is devoted chiefly to evidence adduced by the defendant in opposition to plaintiff’s case, whereas the question is whether the plaintiff has made out a case requiring submission to the jury.
Notwithstanding contradictory evidence, upon motions for nonsuit and directed verdict the evidence given for the plaintiff must be taken as true, together with every inference of fact which the jury might legally draw from it. Sorenson…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Lippold v. KiddOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Armstrong v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Funk v. BonhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
- McCormick v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. LelandOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Fredrickson v. MAWUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Rader v. Gibbons and Reed CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Malila v. MeachamOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Sprinkle v. LemleyOregon Supreme Court · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.