Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Baker, Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1966PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Plaintiff brought action against a drug retailer and a manufacturer for damages allegedly resulting from the use of MEB/29 (triparanol). The complaint alleged both negligence and breach of warranty. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict for the manufacturer after the trial court withdrew from the jury’s consideration the allegations of breach of warranty. (Plaintiff took a voluntary nonsuit with reference to the retailer, and the retailer is not a party to this appeal.)

The case was tried prior to the publication of our two most recent products-liability decisions: Wights v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lippold v. KiddOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Crotty v. Shartenberg's-New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. Esborg v. Bailey Drug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Raymond Edward Middleton v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Sidney Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API