Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. Firth

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1959PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

This is an action for damages brought by the plaintiff against the defendant P. B. Firth, a chiropractic physician.

The cause was submitted to the jury, not as to error of diagnosis, but solely on the issue of whether or not the defendant had been negligent in treating the back ailment of plaintiff.

Plaintiff prevailed and the defendant appeals.

The plaintiff testified that she had had some pain in the lower part of her back for a period of ten years; that she had gone to chiropractors at various times and obtained relief; that she went to the defendant, who was a chiropractor, relieving human…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wemett v. MountOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hilgedorf v. BertschingerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Burroughs v. Curtiss Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Dolan v. GalluzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Dowell v. MossbergOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Creasey v. HoganOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Trees v. OrdonezOregon Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API