Legal Opinion

William Cooper & Nephews, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 3, 1943No. C. D. 763PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

The merchandise in this case was imported at the port of Chicago and is described on the invoice as “30 Casks Contg 5040 lbs. DERRIS RESIN MIXED WITH INERT POWDER (10% Derris Resin, 90% Inert Powder).” It appears from a red-ink notation on the invoice that the appraiser advisorily classified the merchandise as a chemical compound. The collector assessed duty thereon at the *248rate of 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 5 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1001, par. 5), which reads as follows:

All chemical elements, all chemical salts, and compounds, all medicinal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. NagaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Lehn v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  2. Roche-Organon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  3. Biddle Sawyer Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API