Legal Opinion

United States v. Sheldon & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1926No. 2780PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

Merchandise, called “lobster paste,” was assessed' for duty by the-collector as “fish paste” at 30 per centum* ad valorem under par*319agraph 721 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent part of which is as follows:

• Par. 721. * * * fish paste and fish sauce, 30 per centum ad valo-rem; * * * , w '

The importer claimed in the protests that the merchandise was free of duty under paragraph 1662 of the Tariff Act of 1922, as lobsters, prepared or preserved in any manner.

Paragraph 1662 reads as follows:

Par. 1662. Shrimps, lobsters, and other shellfish, fresh, frozen, packed in ice, or prepared or…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. William Cooper & Nephews, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  2. United States v. Hess Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API