Legal Opinion

Roche-Organon, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 29, 1944No. C. D. 848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

The distinction to be drawn, for tariff purposes, between a medicinal preparation and a drug has been the subject of-several recent cases before us. In all of them, the importer sought to obtain classification as a drug, basing such claim on the premise that the merchandise under consideration, in its imported condition, required further processing before application as a therapeutic agent for medicinal purposes. In support thereof, testimony was introduced of expert witnesses familiar with the processing of the product in the country of exportation and the subsequent adjustments…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McKesson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  3. Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  4. Battle & Co. Chemists' Corp. v. States.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1901
  5. Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bayer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  2. Roche-Organon, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. Roche-Organon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  4. Sherka Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  5. Sherka Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API