Synthetic Patents Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cole, Judge:
Medicinal preparations, classifiable at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 5 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1001, par. 5), and'drugs — those in a crude state entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1201, par. 1669) and those advanced in value or condition dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 34 of the said tariff act (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1001, par. 34)—are not as easily distinguishable as many surmise, and when presented under the guise of a legal controversy, as in this case, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Fink v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. MerckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
- McKesson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
- Roche-Organon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
- Bayer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
- Biddle Sawyer Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.