Legal Opinion
Stephenson v. Oneok Resources Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 21, 2004No. 99,383PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge:
1 1 This case arises from a dispute regarding overhead charges under an oil and gas lease joint operating agreement (JOA) and its attached Council of Petroleum Account ants Societies (COPAS) accounting procedure.1 The operator under the JOA, Defendant/Appellant Oneok Resources Company (Operator), seeks review of the trial court's judgment, based on a jury verdict, granting judgment against it both on the claim of the non-operating, participating working interest owners, Plaintiffs/Appellees (Owners) for declaratory relief and on Operator's counterclaim against…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Luetkemeyer v. MagnussonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- The Pantry, Inc. v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2009
- Integris Health, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Jones v. Western Flyer Express LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- Stephenson v. Oneok Resources Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004