Legal Opinion

Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1999No. 90,206PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 KAUGER, J.:

¶ 2 The first impression question presented is whether a faxed or facsimile delivery of a written notice renewing a commercial lease is sufficient to exercise timely the renewal option of the lease. Under the facts presented, we hold that it is.

¶ 3 FACTS

¶ 4 The appellant, Osprey, an Oklahoma limited liability company (Osprey), owns commercial property in Edmond, Oklahoma. On March 18, 1977, the appellee, Kelly-Moore Paint Company (Kelly-Moore), a California corporation, negotiated a fifteen-year lease for its Edmond, Oklahoma, store with Osprey’s predecessors James and Victoria…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Patry v. CappsSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. K & K Food Services, Inc. v. S & H, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API