Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 KAUGER, J.:
¶ 2 The first impression question presented is whether a faxed or facsimile delivery of a written notice renewing a commercial lease is sufficient to exercise timely the renewal option of the lease. Under the facts presented, we hold that it is.
¶ 3 FACTS
¶ 4 The appellant, Osprey, an Oklahoma limited liability company (Osprey), owns commercial property in Edmond, Oklahoma. On March 18, 1977, the appellee, Kelly-Moore Paint Company (Kelly-Moore), a California corporation, negotiated a fifteen-year lease for its Edmond, Oklahoma, store with Osprey’s predecessors James and Victoria…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Patry v. CappsSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- K & K Food Services, Inc. v. S & H, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.