Legal Opinion
Munch v. Willametz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 4, 1968PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The defendants have appealed from the denial of their motion to open a default judgment which was rendered against them in an action brought on January 4, 1957, in which the plaintiff sought to recover a balance due him on a contract and for labor and materials furnished to the defendants.
The judgment recites that an attorney appeared for both defendants in February, 1957, and was granted permission to disappear in April, 1957. Other attorneys appeared for both defendants in May, 1957, and filed an answer and a special defense. The case was claimed for the trial list in May, 1957, and was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Solari v. SeperakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Testa v. Carrolls Hamburger System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Culetsu v. DixSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Hilts v. TaftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Slattery v. MaykutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- A. Sangivanni & Sons v. F. M. Floryan & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Higgins v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Manchester State Bank v. RealeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- New England Floor Covering Co. v. Architectural Interiors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.