Testa v. Carrolls Hamburger System, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
This is an appeal from a denial of the defendant’s motion to open and set aside a default and a judgment subsequently rendered in favor of the plaintiff after a hearing in damages. The defendant agrees that its motion was filed pursuant to General Statutes § 52-212. A brief analysis of that statute and its requirements is desirable, if not essential, to a determination of this appeal.
Prior to the Revision of 1958, the statute con sisted of two sections. The first section (Rev. 1949, § 7963) comprised all of what is now § 52-212 except for the last two sentences, and the second section (Rev.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Jacobson v. RobingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Paiwich v. KrieswalisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Gryskiewicz v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Manchester State Bank v. RealeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Collins v. ScholzConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
- New England Floor Covering Co. v. Architectural Interiors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Eastern Elevator Co. v. ScalziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Munch v. WillametzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.