Legal Opinion
Culetsu v. Dix
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 24, 1962PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
The plaintiffs brought this action for personal injuries which they alleged were caused by the negligence of the defendants—John Riccio as an agent and employee of Louis Dix, doing business as the Hickey Cab Company; Louis Dix; and Richard C. Patrignelli. The plaintiffs alleged that they were passengers in a taxicab operated by Riccio which collided in an intersection with an automobile operated by Patrignelli. Patrignelli failed to appear in the action, and a default was entered against him. The case proceeded to trial, and a verdict against the defendants Riccio and Dix was returned. These…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vogel v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Sears v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Hennessey v. HennesseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Johnson v. Rockaway Bus CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Bogart v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Kam Fui Trust Ex Rel. Commercial Management Corp. v. BrandhorstHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
- Munch v. WillametzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Cicero v. E.B.K., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.