Kerley v. Nu-West, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
This case presents questions of whether an agreement to sell land and a consulting agreement are invalid because they constitute an unreasonable restraint on alienation or because they violate the rule against perpetuities. We hold that the agreements are valid.
THE AGREEMENTS
L.C. Jacobson and Resorco, Inc. had an interest in a subdivision known as Pinetop Lakes. In 1980, acting through a trustee, they sold fifteen acres of land in the subdivision to Robert Kerley. They retained their interest in adjoining land.
The transaction was set forth in two separate but…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- De Peyster v. . MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Dunlop v. Dunlop's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- White v. WhiteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Hanigan v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Byke Const. Co., Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. OsguthorpeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- LaFond v. RumlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Tamen v. Alhambra World Investment, Inc. (In re Tamen)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- In Re TamenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994