Byke Const. Co., Inc. v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREER, Judge.
In this matter we have an opportunity to discuss a doctrine long cherished by law school professors and dreaded by most law students: the infamous rule against perpe-tuities. The facts in this matter are not in dispute.
Appellant, Byke Construction Corp. (Byke), sold certain real property to appel-lees, Leo and Vivian Miller (Millers). The escrow instructions executed by the parties contained the following option to repurchase:
IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN SELLER AND BUYER AS FOLLOWS:
3) Buyer agrees to begin house construction on the subject property on or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Zancanaro v. CrossArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Shattuck v. Precision-Toyota, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Mohr Park Manor, Inc. v. MohrNevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Dutch Inns of America, Inc. v. Horizon CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Old Port Cove Holdings, Inc. v. CONDO. ASS'N ONE, INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Whiting Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- Hays v. CoeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Malad, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Kerley v. Nu-West, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.