Legal Opinion

Byke Const. Co., Inc. v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 16, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 6639PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREER, Judge.

In this matter we have an opportunity to discuss a doctrine long cherished by law school professors and dreaded by most law students: the infamous rule against perpe-tuities. The facts in this matter are not in dispute.

Appellant, Byke Construction Corp. (Byke), sold certain real property to appel-lees, Leo and Vivian Miller (Millers). The escrow instructions executed by the parties contained the following option to repurchase:

IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN SELLER AND BUYER AS FOLLOWS:

3) Buyer agrees to begin house construction on the subject property on or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Zancanaro v. CrossArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Shattuck v. Precision-Toyota, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mohr Park Manor, Inc. v. MohrNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Dutch Inns of America, Inc. v. Horizon CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Old Port Cove Holdings, Inc. v. CONDO. ASS'N ONE, INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Whiting Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. Hays v. CoeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Malad, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Kerley v. Nu-West, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API