Legal Opinion
White v. White
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 19, 1969PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
105 N.J. Super. 184 (1969)
251 A.2d 470
EUSTACE WHITE AND ARNOLD TANNER, CO-EXECUTORS UNDER THE WILL OF THOMAS E. CATCHPOLE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
JAMES WHITE, ROGER WHITE AND MARGARET W. TANNER, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided March 19, 1969.
Mr. Arnold Tanner, attorney for plaintiffs.
Mr. Daniel J. O'Hern for defendant James White (Messrs. Abramoff, Apy & O'Hern, attorneys).
Mr. William R. Blair, Jr. for defendants Roger White and Margaret W. Tanner (Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Warren, attorneys).
LANE, J.C.S.
This action was instituted by the executors…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. RobertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Highway Holding Co. v. Yara Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- In re the Settlement of the Estate of CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Chase National Bank v. DeichmillerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Bottomley v. BottomleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. OsguthorpeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- LaFond v. RumlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Ierrobino v. MegaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- In re the Estate of BakerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- In Re Estate of KolbingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.