Legal Opinion
Bhc Interim Funding II, L.P. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs BHC Interim Funding II, L.P. and BHC Interim Funding III, L.P. (collectively, “BHC”) bring this suit against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver for Waterfield Bank. Defendant FDIC has moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Upon consideration of the motion [Dkt. # 10], and the opposition thereto, the Court concludes that the motion must be granted as to one claim. The court dismisses the remaining…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Westberg v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Westberg v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Firstier Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Integral Development Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Roggio v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.